Commons:Administradores
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Esta página explica el rol de administrador en Wikimedia Commons. Los detalles del rol y la forma en la que se eligen los administradores puede ser diferente que en otros proyectos.
Si necesita ayuda de administradores por favor acuda a Administrators' noticeboard.
En este momento hay 180 administradores en Commons.
¿Qué es un administrador?
Administrators as of octubre 2024 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 180
If 180 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Aspecto técnico
Los administradores son usuarios que tienen la posibilidad técnica en Wikimedia Commons de:
- borrar y restaurar imágenes y otros ficheros cargados, así como ver y restaurar revisiones borradas;
- borrar y restaurar páginas, así como ver y restaurar revisiones borradas;
- proteger y desproteger páginas, así como editar páginas protegidas a nivel de «solo administradores»;
- editar algunos mensajes de la interfaz (véase también Commons:Administradores de interfaz);
- añadir o retirar determinados permisos de usuario;
- configurar campañas del asistente de subida de archivos (Upload Wizard);
- ocultar o restaurar entradas de registro o revisiones en las páginas;
- importar páginas de otros wikis;
- fusionar historiales de páginas;
- modificar filtros antiabusos;
- no crear redirecciones desde las páginas originales cuando se trasladan;
- ser inmune a las verificaciones antisuplantación así como a la lista negra de nombres de usuario;
- mandar mensajes a múltiples usuarios de una vez (massmessage);
- usar límites de API más altos.
Estos son los conocidos «botones» o herramientas del administrador.
Rol en la comunidad
Los administradores son miembros experimentados y confiables de acuerdo a la comunidad, que realizan un trabajo adicional de mantenimiento, obteniendo las herramientas de administradores mediante consenso público o votación. Si bien los administradores tienen distintas áreas de interés y experiencia, las tareas típicas incluyen determinar el resultado y cerrar pedidos de borrado, borrar violaciones de derecho de autor, restaurar archivos según corresponda, proteger Commons contra el vandalismo, y trabajar en plantillas y otras páginas protegidas. Por supuesto, algunas de estas tareas pueden hacerlas también otros usuarios.
Se espera que los administradores entiendan el alcance de este proyecto, y estén preparados para trabajar constructivamente con otro para lograr esos fines. Los administradores también deben entender y seguir las políticas de Commons, y respetar el consenso de la comunidad.
Aparte de los roles que requieren el uso de las herramientas para administradores, éstos no tienen autoridad especial en virtud de su posición, y en discusiones y votaciones tienen el mismo peso que un editor ordinario. Por supuesto, algunos administradores pueden tener gran influencia, pero eso no se deriva de su posición, sino de la confianza personal que ganaron de la comunidad.
Sugerencias para administradores
Por favor lea la guía para administradores.
Remoción de derechos de administrador
De acuerdo a la política de revocación de los privilegios de administrador, estos permisos pueden revocarse por inactividad o uso inadecuado de las herramientas administrativas. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.
Para ser candidato a administrador
Todos los administradores interesados deben pasar por este proceso y someterse a una RFA, Incluyendo a todos los ex-administradores que están tratando de volver a su papel anterior.
En primer lugar, lea la información que se encuentra en Cómo. Luego haga su pedido en la sección que se encuentra abajo.
- Luego de hacer clic en el botón correspondiente y de crear la subpágina, copie el enlace a la nueva subpágina, por ejemplo "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edite Commons:Administrators/Requests y pegue el enlace al principio de la sección, luego póngalo entre llaves dobles (ejemplo {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) para realizar la transclusión.
- Si otro usuario lo nominó, por favor acepte la nominación indicando "acepto" o algo similar, y firmando debajo de la nominación. Ud. o la persona que lo nomine deberá transcluir la páginas.
En la caja de abajo, reemplaza "Username" con tu nombre de usuario o usuaria |
Votación
Cualquier usuario registrado puede votar aquí, aunque es posible que aquellos que tengan pocas o ninguna edición anterior no se cuenten en su totalidad. Es preferible que dé razones tanto para apoyar como para oponerse a los votos, ya que esto ayudará al burócrata de cierre en su decisión. Se le da más peso a un argumento, con evidencia de apoyo si es necesario, que a un simple voto .
Normalmente se requiere 75% de votos a favor, con un mínimo de 8 votos favorables. No se cuentan los votos de usuarios no registrados. Sin embargo, el burócrata que cierra la nominación puede usar su discreción para juzgar el consenso de la comunidad, por lo que la decisión no se basa necesariamente en los números indicados. Los burócratas pueden, a su discreción, extender el período de una RpA si creen que será útil para determinar mejor el consenso de la comunidad .
Los comentarios neutrales, indicados con la plantilla Neutral, no se cuentan en las estadísticas indicadas en el párrafo anterior para que el burócrata determine el resultado de la votación. Estos comentarios son parte de la discusión, pueden persuadir a otros y permiten que el burócrata entienda mejor el consenso de la comunidad.
Purgar antememoria Utiliza el enlace siguiente para editar la página transcluida.
Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Modern_primat (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth) (Activity: Talk Commons DR)
- Scheduled to end: 19:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Merhaba! Sayın Commons topluluğu; İşte, bugün, burada hizmetli olmak için başvuruyorum. Bu başvuruyu kendi dilimde yapmamın sebebi Commons'un çok dilli oluşudur. Madem öyle, bu bir ilk olsun. Önceki yüzlerce başvuru arasından bu ilk mi değil mi kontrol etmedim açıkçası.
Gelelim neden hizmetli olmam gerektiğine... Öncelikle, hiçbir vikide yeteri kadar hizmetli yoktur, olmayacak. Commons Wikimedia'da daha fazla hizmetli her zaman iyidir. Benim bu duruma özel olarak katkı vereceğim şey ise... Anadilimin Türkçe oluşudur. Sadece 1 tane anadili Türkçe olan var. Daha fazla dil, daha fazla kullanıcıya yardım etmek demektir bence. Ek olarak aktifim ve uzlaşmacıyım. Bu yer neredeyse benim ana-vikim oldu sayılır.
Gelelim ne yapabileceğime... Dosyaları silmek, kullanıcıları engellemek için hizmetli araçları elbette lazım. Ancak kesin emin olduğum durumlar için ivedi aksiyon alacağımı veya emin değilsem tereddüt edeceğimi düşünüyorum. Bir hata yapmaktansa hiçbir şey yapmamalıyız. Ben topluluğun kararına ise kesinlikle saygı duyacağımı belirtmeliyim. Ayrıca yıllar boyu, maddelerde kullanılan ve elde etmek için çok emek verdiğim yüzlerce kendi fotolarım var ve inşallah binlerce olacak. Yeni dosyalarda çok dolaşırım, bulduğum telif haklarını hızlı silinmeye veya SAS(Deletion request)'a koyarım. Kullanıcıları uyarırım, yol gösteririm. COM:AN/U ve köy çeşmesine(village pump) bakıyorum. Ayrıca 1 yıl önce ve geçen aylar içinde lisans inceleyici ve dosya taşıyıcı oldum. Bundan dolayı telif hakkı kurallarına aşinayım. Değişikliklerimi inceleyebilirsiniz. İletişim için e-postam açıktır.
Gelelim hatalarıma... Bu projede 2021'den beri aktifim ve giderek düzenli olarak aktifliğimi artırıyorum. Bazen stres, özel hayat neticelerinde ve bazen Türkçe Vikipedi'de yaşananlardan dolayı hatalarım var. Hatta bunlardan dolayı engel yiyecektim az kalsın. Diğer vikilerle burayı karşılaştırırsam burada engellenmememin sebebi, hele onca katkıdan sonra, dil engeli ve "kirli işlerle"(bundan kastım tartışmalı konular) uğraşmamamdır. Ayrıca her hatamdan sonra bir durakladım, diğer vikilerde bunu pek yapmam. O yüzden çok katkımın olduğu yerlerde ya engellenmişimdir ya da orada hiç katkım yoktur :D. Commons bunun için bir istisna.
Hizmetli olmak istememin bir amacı şudur, gelen eleştiriler ve destekler doğrultusunda Commons'taki işimi geliştirmek. En kötü ihtimalle hatalarımı derinlemesine göreceğim, en iyi ihtimalle de kendimi bu harika projeye adamak ve işleri halletmek için vazife alacağım. Buraya kendini adamışlar aha şu dereden bir yudum su içerler ve benim o dereye girip yüzmem gerekli.
Son olarak bu başvuruyu hiçbir yerde paylaşmayacağımı sizlere tebliğ ediyorum. Buraya gelenler sadece denk gelmişler olacak.
I will answer your questions in english. Thank you.
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Votes
Oppose I think they mean well, but I've too often seen comments from them that give me doubts about their judgement and their communication style. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:00, 17 October 2024
- please give example, thank you. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 07:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- The two that come to mind immediately because I was directly involved are:
- You completely missed the point of the discussion at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_114#Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Donald_J_Trump_(realDonaldTrump)_Twitter_-_публикация_от_2020-05-29.png and your contribution wasn't constructive.
- I don't think *any* of your contributions in Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections/Archive_39#Block_review:_Dronebogus were helpful or particularly on topic.
- However, I've seen enough posts by you where I scratched my head and wondered what you were hoping to achieve, or felt you were more of a distraction than a help, that that's the lens I've come to view you through. You do perfectly good work when it's straightforward - reporting copyvios and vandals for example - but I don't trust that you'd be a net positive in discussions that are serious and nuanced. I've also got to say that your response to alachuckthebuck's question below is flippant and inadequate, which further reinforces my concerns. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:53, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- The two that come to mind immediately because I was directly involved are:
- please give example, thank you. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 07:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Neutral I concur with the above comment. I think their intentions are good but sometimes they come across as too harsh or too chill-y. I would expect a more serious tone. --Bedivere (talk) 01:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Does not have the best attitude or judgment. Wolverine XI 03:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Too many blocks in other projects --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Weak support We need more Turkish-speaking admins, and I really want this to succeed, I'm not going to hold the blocks against modern unless someone who can read the original block notices says otherwise. But I don't see strong evidence of the calm expected of admins at this time, per Bedivere. I will be the first to say that Modern is a net positive to the project, and I want them to succeed and take the mop. Admins aren't expected to be happy-go-lucky all the time, but they are expected to have a higher level of professionalism than the average contributor. If they improve their communication, I will happily change to a strong support. What Modern should take away here is that most of the issues we are bringing up can easily be fixed. Per comments made by Aafi at my LR request and repeated elsewhere, drama from other projects shouldn't be brought to Commons, and it doesn't have any bearing on people's suitability for the mop on Commons. The reason they were blocked might be an issue, but if that is, it will show itself in due time. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I agree that Modern primat is net-positive to the project but I agree with Bedivere about their comments. I'd likely support next time if communication aspects are worked upon as pointed by others. Good Communication is an important aspect of the admin mop - and unfortunately it is missing here. Regards, Aafi (talk) 05:23, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Personally, my overall impressions of MP were not bad so far. However at this point I tend to agree with Aafi and Bedivere, sorry. --A.Savin 13:36, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Oppose No issues with the user but ~14 k edits is too few contributions / too little experience. Apply again at a later point. --Prototyperspective (talk) 13:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't agree with "14k edits is too few contributions/too little experience." A huge number of edits/contribs don't determine experience and definitely is not also "too few". I became an admin here with some 5.5k edits. Experience around where a user intends to contribute (if given the tools), and requisite knowledge of the areas (where they are interested in contributing) and at all the necessary communication skillset - is important aspect. We don't need to haunt people for having lesser edits than many others. Regards, Aafi (talk) 18:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- We don't need to haunt people for having lesser edits than many others Very much agree. Prototyperspective (talk) 18:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't agree with "14k edits is too few contributions/too little experience." A huge number of edits/contribs don't determine experience and definitely is not also "too few". I became an admin here with some 5.5k edits. Experience around where a user intends to contribute (if given the tools), and requisite knowledge of the areas (where they are interested in contributing) and at all the necessary communication skillset - is important aspect. We don't need to haunt people for having lesser edits than many others. Regards, Aafi (talk) 18:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I don't think the attitude problem pointed out here have improved, and I'm not sure if you understand the problem. To me, you appear to do things quite lightly. And the block on trwiki makes me even more worried. While I'm not a heavy user here, I see your work in various archive pages. But this can't fully wipe off concerns above. Sorry, Tmv (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Here’s my opinion in three points:
- There are concerns about the communication style and judgment, as the user's comments sometimes come across as harsh or lacking seriousness.
- The multiple blocks in other projects raise doubts about their suitability for a position of responsibility.
- Despite good intentions, the user needs to improve communication and professionalism to be qualified for this role.-- Mohammed Qays 🗣 20:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I share the concerns expressed by others. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Can you specify which concerns? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 23:34, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- oh, i remember you. you banned me from wikimedia discord!
- but, thank you all guys. i will fix issues hopefully. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 05:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Oppose for many factors. The user was blocked on 3 wikis(!) including two indefs, in addition to a week long block on enwiki a year ago. Also their maturity is questionable like this. Also, their oppose on Turkmen's request for license reviewer isn't convincing either. ToadetteEdit (talk) 06:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Comment That oppose has been struck after further discussion on that page. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but there have been far too many recent blocks on other wikis (including 3 indefs, 2 of which with TPA removed) for me to support you at this time. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- The indefinite block at azWP seems to be, because he did not follow the anti armenien behaviour there. This block I would not count. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Oppose -- as SHB2000 above me. Indefinite block at the home Wiki. No way. And at least for the request text I expect, that there is written an english text. I want to see a proof, thet the lungua franca of the project is spoken good enough. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Comments
- Please mention the languages you speak on your talk page with Commons:Babel templates. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:48, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- i added now. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 05:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Question by alachuckthebuck Hello Modern, Can you please explain the references to blocks on other wikis? As someone who was blocked for some time on en-wiki, that isn't an automatic decline, but why is your behavior on commons diffrent from your behavior other wikis? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 21:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- as you can see from my LR request: Commons:License_review/Requests/Archive/2023#Modern_primat im blocked on three wikis. but im gonna only explain tr wiki here.
- but, i should say about my ban on tr wikiquote got soft ban. i can edit articles now.
- on tr wiki, it is real mess unfortunantly. my block record changed in january 24' and they say im sockpuppet... my only defence is: i didnt, never use sockpuppet. previous block on tr wiki is... you can check my LR request for more detail. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 07:00, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Fun fact: if you let Google translate the introduction text into German, then sysop becomes servant and henchman. --A.Savin 18:44, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- oh yeah :D, hizmetli literally means servant. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for bureaucratship
Cuando esté terminado, las páginas enumeradas aquí deben archivarse en Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.